Breakeven Basics

 Break-even analysis is one of the most insightful tools you can use anytime a price change or discount is being considered. Too often, teams jump straight to “What should we do next?” without grounding the conversation in what the business actually needs to maintain — or grow — profitability.

Most break-even conversations I see focus only on revenue:
“If we discount, we just need 100 or 200 more units to make up the difference.”

But that’s not the real break-even point.
The real question is: What does it take to break even on profit?

When you shift the analysis from revenue to profit, you get a much clearer picture of what’s truly required to keep the business whole. It forces you to quantify the tradeoff between price and volume — and it often reveals that the bar for “making up the discount” is far higher than people assume.

And here’s the part nobody likes to say out loud:
One of the worst feelings in the real world is working harder to make less money.
A discount can put you in exactly that position — producing more units, pushing more volume, running the team harder… all while earning less on every unit because the price was lowered. Break-even analysis exposes that dynamic before you accidentally sign up for it.

One of the simplest ways to frame this is through elasticity. If you take a 1% price decrease, you should expect at least a 1% increase in volume just to stay even — that’s unit elasticity. If you’re discounting 1% and expecting a 2% lift in volume, that’s even better. But the key is to measure it, not guess.

The chart below illustrates this concept with a break-even curve and an equal-profit line. In economics, the goal is to maximize profit — not revenue, not volume, not “busyness.” And maximizing profit doesn’t always mean lowering price. In fact, in many organizations, the current price is already below the profit-maximizing point. When you discount from an already underpriced position, you’re not being strategic — you’re digging the hole deeper.

The next visualization is a table that steps through price changes of 1%, 2%, 3%, 5%, and 10%, showing the required units to break even at both the revenue level and the profit level. This is where leaders often have their “aha” moment. The revenue break-even might look manageable. The profit break-even often does not — and that’s exactly why this analysis matters.

So the next time you’re considering a price change or discount, run a break-even analysis. If you want help, reach out — I’m happy to walk you through the guidelines in Excel and share a simple break-even model you can use with your team.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Intro

     After three years working in pricing—alongside a background in natural resource economics and a master’s in applied econometrics—I’ve come to see pricing as one of the most fascinating areas in business. It’s not just about supply and demand curves or profit maximization. In practice, pricing is messy, nuanced, and deeply human. That complexity is what makes it so compelling. I’ve wanted to document my journey and growth in this field, especially the patterns I’ve observed. As "pricers", we often focus on the exciting parts: choosing between value-based, cost-plus, or competitive models (and interesting variations such as good, better, best). Or speculating on how AI might transform pricing strategy, execution and analytics. But we also dig into the gritty details—the DNA of our systems—where real change happens. Early on, I felt lost. I didn’t know how to measure whether our pricing was working. That’s when I discovered revenue bridges and the power of using them fo...
Read more

Assessing Averages

Image
     I really love statistics. They’re all over the place business, economics, the grocery store — average cost per ounce, sale prices, distribution. But here’s the funny thing about some of the averages: the “ASP,” or Average Sale Price, is just that — an average. And if you’re not careful, you can end up averaging the averages. Think about it. Instead of saying, we did half a million dollars in revenue, sold 50,000 units, which equates to $10 per unit , what often happens is someone takes the, say 8 thousand transactions that the revenue happened over — a spread of prices — and averages those transaction-level averages. Suddenly, you’re looking at $9 or $12.50 instead of the true $10. That’s not just sloppy math; it’s misleading. Even weighted ASPs—which I recommend using in pricing—while technically correct, can still hide the real story. Dan Heath talks about this idea of untangling averages in his book “Reset”. His example comes from the military’s attempt to des...
Read more

Revenue Bridge?

Image
       Revenue bridges might not be carved from granite — but they’re just as solid when built on comparison. They’re built on the comparison of prices, volume, product mix. We compare constantly — especially in sports. Yankees vs. Dodgers. Jordan or LeBron. Scheffler vs. Tiger (too soon?) In the 1500s, Pope Leo X had a beloved white elephant named Hanno, living in luxury at the Vatican. Then came Ganda — a rhinoceros, the first seen in Europe in over a thousand years. Naturally, the Pope staged a showdown to answer the question of which animal was superior. Ganda charged. Hanno fled. The Pope laughed and after calling the rhino ‘a beast of Satan,’ was shipped off (but sadly didn’t survive the journey). Ganda lived on; however, in Albrecht Dürer’s famous woodcut — armor-plated and horned, despite the artist never seeing a rhino. Hanno remained the Pope's prized animal.  In business, we’re lucky to have more reliable comparisons than an elephant to a rhino. Rev...
Read more