The Pricing Metric Conundrum

Whether we realize it or not, every business already uses pricing metrics. Per unit. Per hour. Per visit. Per membership. Per “benefit delivered.” They’re everywhere. And behind all of them sits one simple idea:

A price metric should reflect the value being created or consumed.

That’s really the whole game. A good metric becomes the lens through which customers understand what they’re paying for — and the lens through which you understand how value varies across segments, features, and usage patterns.

But not all metrics are created equal. In practice, there are five criteria that separate a strong pricing metric from a weak one.

What Makes a Good Pricing Metric?

1. It tracks differences in value across segments.

If one customer gets 10x the value of another, your metric should capture that difference.

2. It tracks differences in cost-to-serve.

If certain segments are more expensive to support, your metric should naturally scale with that cost.

3. It’s easy to implement and unambiguous.

If customers can’t tell what they’re being charged for — or your team can’t explain it clearly — the metric will fail.

4. It positions your price attractively against competitors.

Metrics shape perception. A per-user price might look expensive next to a competitor’s flat fee, even if your total cost is lower.

5. It aligns with how buyers experience value.

Your metric should match the moment the customer feels the benefit. If they experience value per transaction, don’t charge per month. If they experience value per outcome, don’t charge per input.

A Quick Note on Fairness (Because It Still Matters)

Even the most elegant pricing metric will fall flat if customers feel the price is unfair. Fairness isn’t a separate topic — it’s the emotional filter through which buyers interpret your metric.

You don’t need a full economic value estimation lesson here. The simple truth is this:
A good metric should not only reflect value — it should feel aligned with the benefit the buyer experiences.

That’s the difference between a metric that works on paper and one that works in the real world.

Where Good Metrics Come From

Most pricing metrics don’t arrive fully formed. They come from brainstorming, testing, and revisiting old assumptions. You list every possible metric, run them through the criteria, and then pressure-test them against historical data.

  • What would this metric have done to revenue last year?
  • Would it have changed customer behavior?
  • Would it have changed our cost-to-serve?

Sometimes the best metric is performance-based — but those come with their own challenges.

The Performance-Based Trap

Performance-based pricing sounds like the holy grail:
“You only pay when you get results.”

But it can create perverse incentives.

Take a gym membership. Today, gyms charge for access — monthly or yearly. But imagine they charged based on inches lost around the waist. Suddenly the customer has every incentive to “game” the measurement. You’d need official weigh-in stations, standardized processes, and a whole infrastructure just to keep the metric honest.

Performance-based metrics can be powerful, but they require trust, transparency, and a way to measure outcomes that neither party can manipulate.

A Real-World Example: Domo’s Shift to Value-Based Pricing

I use Domo, and their pricing evolution is a great case study. Originally, they priced like most data visualization platforms: per user + data volume.

But they eventually realized something important: A small team with a small dataset can extract just as much value as a large team with a massive dataset. The old metric didn’t reflect value — it reflected tradition.

So they shifted to a credit-based system where specific actions inside the platform consume credits. Customers get full access, but they pay based on what they do with the product — not how many people log in or how much data sits in storage.

It’s a bold move, and because Domo is publicly traded, you can actually watch how the market responds over time. Their stock price becomes a kind of meta-metric for how well the new pricing model is resonating.

The Bottom Line

Whatever metric you choose, make sure it:

  • Reflects value
  • Scales with cost
  • Is simple to understand
  • Positions you well competitively
  • Feels fair

And above all, be willing to get creative. Some of the best pricing breakthroughs come from questioning the “standard” metric everyone else uses.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Intro

     After three years working in pricing—alongside a background in natural resource economics and a master’s in applied econometrics—I’ve come to see pricing as one of the most fascinating areas in business. It’s not just about supply and demand curves or profit maximization. In practice, pricing is messy, nuanced, and deeply human. That complexity is what makes it so compelling. I’ve wanted to document my journey and growth in this field, especially the patterns I’ve observed. As "pricers", we often focus on the exciting parts: choosing between value-based, cost-plus, or competitive models (and interesting variations such as good, better, best). Or speculating on how AI might transform pricing strategy, execution and analytics. But we also dig into the gritty details—the DNA of our systems—where real change happens. Early on, I felt lost. I didn’t know how to measure whether our pricing was working. That’s when I discovered revenue bridges and the power of using them fo...
Read more

Assessing Averages

Image
     I really love statistics. They’re all over the place business, economics, the grocery store — average cost per ounce, sale prices, distribution. But here’s the funny thing about some of the averages: the “ASP,” or Average Sale Price, is just that — an average. And if you’re not careful, you can end up averaging the averages. Think about it. Instead of saying, we did half a million dollars in revenue, sold 50,000 units, which equates to $10 per unit , what often happens is someone takes the, say 8 thousand transactions that the revenue happened over — a spread of prices — and averages those transaction-level averages. Suddenly, you’re looking at $9 or $12.50 instead of the true $10. That’s not just sloppy math; it’s misleading. Even weighted ASPs—which I recommend using in pricing—while technically correct, can still hide the real story. Dan Heath talks about this idea of untangling averages in his book “Reset”. His example comes from the military’s attempt to des...
Read more

Revenue Bridge?

Image
       Revenue bridges might not be carved from granite — but they’re just as solid when built on comparison. They’re built on the comparison of prices, volume, product mix. We compare constantly — especially in sports. Yankees vs. Dodgers. Jordan or LeBron. Scheffler vs. Tiger (too soon?) In the 1500s, Pope Leo X had a beloved white elephant named Hanno, living in luxury at the Vatican. Then came Ganda — a rhinoceros, the first seen in Europe in over a thousand years. Naturally, the Pope staged a showdown to answer the question of which animal was superior. Ganda charged. Hanno fled. The Pope laughed and after calling the rhino ‘a beast of Satan,’ was shipped off (but sadly didn’t survive the journey). Ganda lived on; however, in Albrecht Dürer’s famous woodcut — armor-plated and horned, despite the artist never seeing a rhino. Hanno remained the Pope's prized animal.  In business, we’re lucky to have more reliable comparisons than an elephant to a rhino. Rev...
Read more